In Brief

Allied Seawind II 32 Sail Plan Following in the hallowed footsteps of the original Seawind, a salty 30 foot ketch designed by Tom Gillmer that happened to be the first fiberglass sailboat to circumnavigate the globe, the Seawind II is a larger, more comfortable redesign that’s a foot longer, a foot wider, and over 23% heavier. These boats were launched in 1975 by Allied Yachts and they had a reputation for being solidly built, though with a history of inconsistent and uninspiring internal finishing. The company went out of business four times, before finally shutting down for the fifth time in 1981, spelling the end of production for the Seawind II.

Allied Yachts was founded in 1962 on the Hudson River a hundred miles north of New York City in the small town of Catskill as a partnership between a fiberglass boat builder Lunn Laminates and a yacht brokerage of Northrop and Johnson and racing sailor Thor Ramsing. Their first boat, the Seawind, a popular 30’ 6” ketch had the company busy keeping up with demand.

These were still the exciting pioneering days of fibreglass sailboat construction when the material was still considered experimental and hulls were conservatively built extra thick. When New Yorker, Alan Eddy, setoff in 1963 to eventually circle the globe in Apogee, the accomplishment did much to not only put to rest skepticism over fibreglass construction, but also to establish Allied’s reputation for building seaworthy sailboats.

Despite the original Seawind proving itself as a competent bluewater sailboat, it had minimal accommodations that were, at best, cramped. So after over a decade of successful production of the Seawind, Allied approached Gillmer to evolve the design into a successor – the Seawind II. Though it was only 13 inches longer, its beam was 13% wider which resulted in a displacement 23% heavier. The result was a much more comfortable boat with significantly larger internal volume and improved accommodations.

Allied Seawind II 32 Layout Structurally the new boat was just as sturdy and had improvements over the original construction. The hull was hand-laid and substantially thick and well supported bulkheads that were fiberglassed into place. Furthermore the hull-deck joint, which was prone to leaking in the original Seawind was improved with no expense spared. The new joint was complex, labor intensive to construct but very strong. Both hull and deck had outward flanges at the sheer line. These flanges were coated with sealant and a teak batten placed between them. Hull, deck, and batten were then through-bolted vertically with stainless steel bolts. After the sealant cured over a number of days, the joint was ground flush on the interior of the hull and glassed over heavily. Meanwhile on the exterior a heavy aluminum extrusion was filled with bedding, capped over the flange, and horizontally screwed into the teak batten.

The deck and cabin were of fiberglass cored in balsa wood. All deck hardware was through-bolted and reinforced with fiberglass backing plates to distribute the load. The mast was deck-stepped and supported from below by a substantial oak compression frame that extends into the bilge. Ballast is an internal lead casting glassed into the keel.

There’s very little exterior wood on the Seawind II, even the dorado boxes are molded in, resulting in a low maintenance boat, but also gives her an austere look.

Unusual to see in a sailboat this small is a ketch rig which was offered as standard, there was an optional cutter rig which carried slightly less canvas but had similar performance. As to be expected, Seawind II sails well under heavy sea conditions, but perhaps surprisingly it’s quite competent in light weather as well. She has a very comfortable motion at sea, is well balanced with very little signs of weather helm.

Overall the Seawind II today is a practical and affordable choice as a go-anywhere cruiser. She’s strong without being overly heavy, well constructed and proven. Many examples on the used market have held up well, with later models generally having better finished interiors.

Specifications

LOA: 31′ 7″
LWL: 25′ 6″
Beam: 10′ 5″
Draft: 4′ 6″
Displacement: 14,900 lbs.
Ballast: 5,800 lbs.
Sail Area, Cutter Rig: 513 sq.ft.
Sail Area, Ketch Rig: 555 sq.ft.
Bridge Clearance, Ketch Rig: 43′ 0″

Headroom: 6′ 2″
Fuel: 40 US Gal.
Water: 60 US Gal.

Engine: Westerbeke 27hp Diesel

Year Introduced: 1975
Year Ended: 1982
Total Built: 129
Designer: Tom Gillmer
Builder: Allied Yachts

Similar Boats

Allied Seawind 30

Links, References and Further Reading

» Seawind II owners association website
» Sailing Magazine, Feb 1999, Used Boat Notebook by John Kretschmer

Gallery

Allied Seawind II 32 Sailboats for Sale

NEW! List your boat for sale right here. Pricing is $16.90 per listing until sold.

Please contribute additional information about this boat...

Add your stories, experiences, tidbits, updated information - whatever you think is useful to others.

2 thoughts on “Allied Seawind II 32”

  1. jim R says:

    When looking at a Seawind II, one should be aware that there were many changes made in construction over the 129 boat run.For example, the earlier boats did not have the more elaborate hull-to-deck joint described above, and consequently leaked like a sieve, even when it rained. I owned hull 11, which did not have some of the niceties touted in the Practical Sailor review I read prior to buying the boat. The first modification I made was to reroute the internal deck scupper drains. Originally, these were long hoses that lead to thruhulls at the transom. The problem was that they would sag and fill with water; the water would freeze and rupture the hoses, resulting in a bilge full of water or worse. If one is considering buying a Seawind II, a trip to the owners association page is a must. One more thing not mentioned above: this is a good looking boat. Our dock mate was trying to sell his older Hunter, and when people would come to look at it they would spend more time asking me about the Seawind. Even though it wasn’t for sale, I still got a couple offers.

Leave a Reply